Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Synthesis's avatar

The block trade with Jump and the parlay question belong in the same paragraph. Kalshi is trying to be a bespoke institutional derivatives exchange and a consumer sports gambling app simultaneously. Selig restricting parlays wouldn't stymie growth so much as force a choice between two business models that undermine each other's regulatory story. A six-figure carbon allowance contract brokered by Jump looks a lot more like a "valuable financial instrument" when it isn't sharing a platform with NBA player prop parlays. Sometimes the regulator who trims the product is doing more for your long-term positioning than the one who lets you do everything.

No posts

Ready for more?