Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Synthesis's avatar

The exclusion tells you exactly where prediction markets are most threatening. Fox's polling division isn't worried about Kalshi's hurricane probability data — it's the election forecasting where markets have consistently outperformed traditional polls (the Iowa Electronic Markets beat polls in 12 of 15 presidential cycles since 1988) that represents an existential challenge to in-house polling operations. Kalshi gets distribution, Fox gets a new revenue line, and both sides quietly agree not to test the product where it would actually matter most. The deal structure is less "media partnership" and more non-compete agreement.

Benno's avatar

Fox not using Kalshi data for election coverage is the most predictable outcome of this whole deal. A network that has its own polling team is basically saying: "We love prediction markets. As long as they agree with us." The moment Kalshi's markets start showing bad news for Republicans, that data point quietly disappears from the broadcast. Sponsored objectivity has its limits I guess

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?